Mr. Ismail Piran Qureshi,Constituted Attorney Mrs.Rubab Bi Ismail Qureshi v. Municipal Corporation Of Greater Mumbai And ANR

909.CAA949_2017.doc Vidya Amin

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION No. 949 OF 2017 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER No. 554 OF 2017 Ismail Piran Qureshi, through Constituted Attorney Ajmal Ishaque Sayed, authorized person of Rubab Ismail Piran Qureshi ... Applicant Vs.

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Anr.

... Respondents Mr. Suryajeet P. Chavan, Advocate for the applicant. Mrs. Madhuri More, Advocate for the respondent No. 1/Corporation. CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.

DATE: 17th November, 2017.

P.C.:

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant's online application for regularization of the structure is presented before the Corporation on 6th November, 2017 and, therefore, he prays that the Corporation be directed not to take action in respect of the suit structure and to decide the said proposal. 2.

The learned counsel for the respondent/Corporation produced the photographs of the demolition of the suit structure and submitted that the Corporation has already started demolition of the building on 3rd November, 2017 and part of the structure is demolished. 1 / 2

909.CAA949_2017.doc 3.

The applicant's online application for regularization of the structure is now tabled before the Commissioner of Corporation. In view of the order dated 19th July, 2017, the M.C.G.M. to decide the said application for regularization of the structure on or before 8th December, 2017. Till then, the Corporation not to carry on further demolition and the applicant shall not reconstruct the demolished portion. Parties to maintain status-quo as on today. 4.

Civil Application stands disposed of.

(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) 2 / 2