Mr. Amol Bandopant Satkar And ANR. v. Mr. Diliprao M. Mokashi And ANR.

902-wp-9703-2016.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATTE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9703 OF 2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2917 OF 2016 Diliprao M. Mokashi and Another

...Petitioners

vs.

State of Maharashtra and Others

...Respondents

Mr. Vineet Naik, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Rakesh Reddy, for the Petitioners Mr. Y.S. Jahagirdar, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. S.R. Nargolkar i/b. Mr. Swapnil Mohite, for Respondent No. 2 Mrs. R.M. Shinde, for the Respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 4-State. Mr. Harshad Inamdar, for the Intervener in C.A.No. 2917 of 2016. CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ.

DATE :

NOVEMBER 25, 2016 P.C.:

.

Parties through their counsel.

2.

Heard on the Civil Application No. 2917 of 2016 filed by the proposed Intervener. On due consideration, the Application is allowed. The Intervener is allowed to argue in the matter. Copy of the Petition be supplied to the counsel of the Intervener during the course of the day. Reply of the Petition if any, be filed by the Intervener on or before next date of hearing.

Vishal Parekar 1/2

902-wp-9703-2016.doc 3.

The Civil Application stands disposed of accordingly. 4.

The Petition is directed to be listed on 28th November, 2016.

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.) Vishal Parekar 2/2