Mr. Ravindra Sudhakar Karandikar v. Mrs. Gayatri Ravindra Karandikar Nee Gayatri Avinash Kelkar

vina k. 1 sr.19.cam.325.2016.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.325 OF 2016 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.247 OF 2013 Mr. Ravindra Sudhakar Karandikar ... Applicant V/s.

Mrs. Gayatri Ravindra Karandikar ... Respondent ...

Mr. Ajit S. Karwande for the applicant.

...

CORAM : A. S. OKA & ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.

DATE : 17 JANUARY, 2017.

P.C. :

1.

Perused the substantive prayer in this application. With the passage of time, the prayers do not survive.

2.

The grievance is made by the learned Counsel appearing for the applicant is that though the respondent has shifted her place of residence, she has not place on record her new address.

3.

We direct the advocate representing the respondent to ascertain from the respondent whether her address has undergone any change. If her address has undergone a change, the advocate for the respondent to place on record of Family Court Appeal, the correct address of the respondent.

vina k. 2 sr.19.cam.325.2016.doc 4.

The application is disposed of on the above terms. The learned Advocate for the applicant to forward an authenticated copy of this order to the Advocate for the respondent. The Advocate for the respondent shall act upon the authenticated copy of this order. (ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (A. S. OKA, J.)