Nirmal Rajbhihari Trivedi v. The State Of Maharashtra

30.APPA.1779.18.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1779 OF 2018 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO.1239 OF 2018 Nirmal Rajbihari Trivedi ...Applicant V/s.

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Ms. Pracheta Rathod, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. S.V. Gavand, APP for the Respondent/State. CORAM : A.M.BADAR, J.

DATED : 26th OCTOBER 2018.

P.C. :

1.

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the applicant as well as the learned APP appearing for the respondent/State. 2.

Delay in preferring the appeal challenging conviction and resultant sentence of the applicant is sufficiently explained in the body of the instant application. Therefore, the order; - : ORDER : - (i) The application is allowed.

(ii) The delay in filing the appeal is condoned. (iii) Application is accordingly disposed of. (A.M.BADAR J.) Aarti Palkar 1/1