← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/12422/2017rule made absolute

Nilam Hiraman Bhangre v. Education Officer, Secondary Education Dept. And ORS.

2018-10-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice B.R. Gavai2 pages

(921)-WP-12422-17 .doc BDPSPS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.12422 OF 2017 Nilam Hiraman Bhangre .... Petitioner.

V/s Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Thane and Ors.

..... Respondents.

Mr. Saurabh Oka, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms. Kavita N. Solunke, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 4. CORAM: B. R. GAVAI & M. S. KARNIK, JJ.

DATE: 6th OCTOBER, 2018 ORAL JUDGMENT: (Per B.R. Gavai, J.) 1] Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard by consent of parties.

2] Petitioner has approached this Court being aggrieved by the Order passed by Respondent - Education Officer, thereby rejecting the approval to the appointment of the Petitioner. 3] In the affidavit in reply filed on behalf of the Respondent - Education Officer, it is stated that Respondent - Education Officer 1/2

(921)-WP-12422-17 .doc shall withdraw the impugned order and pass a fresh order in accordance with the Judgment of Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No.8587 of 2016 with connected Writ Petitions dated 10th July 2017.

4] In that view of the matter, Respondent - Education Officer is directed to decide the issue in the light of the Judgment of Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No.8587 of 2016 with connected Writ Petitions dated 10th July 2017 in any case within a period of four weeks from today.

5] Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms. (M. S. KARNIK, J.) (B. R. GAVAI, J.) 2/2