Narendra @ Raju Vinayak Waikar v. Nilima Shrirang Paraspatki And ORS

1 909.2299.19 wp.doc ISM

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2299 OF 2019 Narendra @ Raju Vinayak Waikar .....Petitioner V/s.

Nilima Shrirang Paraspatki and others .....Respondents Mr. Rohit Gangawane for the Petitioner Mr. Harshad Sathe & Saurabh Butala for respondent no. 1 CORAM :

NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE :

OCTOBER 11, 2019.

P.C.

The order impugned dated 05/11/2014 passed below Exhibit 220 is in regard to impounding of an oral partition cum family settlement. There is no convincing reason as to why the order impugned is questioned after period of 4 years. Apart from above, the fact remains that the aforesaid

2 909.2299.19 wp.doc document since was not found to be registered, is rightly impounded. No case for interference is made out. Petition stands dismissed.

[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]