Smt. Varsha Atmaram Kamble And ORS. v. Shri. Hemant Atmaram Kamble And ORS.

6-CAF-230-2014.doc Shailaja

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.230 OF 2014 IN FIRST APPEAL [STAMP] NO.33005 OF 2013 Varsha Atmaram Kamble and others.

] Applicants vs.

Hemant Atmaram Kamble and others.

] Respondents .....

Ms. Rina Kundu, for Applicants.

Ms. Sandhya Mailagir i/b Ms. Anita Bhaktawani, for Respondent No.1.

Mr. Nikhil Mehta, for Respondent No.5-Insurer. .....

CORAM : PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.

DATE : 30th MARCH, 2021.

P.C.

1.

Heard Ms. Kundu, learned Counsel for the applicant. 2.

The applicants have preferred this application seeking condonation of delay of 233 days which according to the learned Counsel had occurred on account of disturbed state of mind of the widow of the deceased due to the sad demise of her husband. She did not have any source of income to approach a lawyer.

6-CAF-230-2014.doc 3.

Mr. Mehta, however, objects prayer of the applicant by stating that cause given is not sufficient.

4.

Having considered the reasons given in the application, it seems that the applicants have made out a sufficient cause for condoning the delay. As such, delay is condoned. 5.

Application is disposed of.

6.

Office is directed to register the appeal.

7.

The appeal be tagged with First Appeal No.1411 of 2013. [PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.]