Kartik Mohan Prasad v. The State Of Maharashtra

1 / 1 43-APEAL-1409-18.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1409 OF 2018 Kartik Mohan Prasad .... Appellant versus State of Maharashtra ... Respondent .......

• Mr.Ghanashyam Upadhyay i/b. Bharat K. Manghani, Advocate for Appellant.

• Mrs.A.S. Pai, APP for Respondent/State.

CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATE : 29th NOVEMBER, 2018.

P.C. :

1.

Learned Counsel for Petitioner states that Appeal is not properly drafted and should be given liberty to withdraw and file afresh. Learned Counsel appearing for first informant (proposed intervenor) does not have any specific objection. 2.

Learned APP is opposing grant of liberty.

3.

This Court has still not looked into merits of the controversy. Hence we grant leave as prayed for with liberty and matter is disposed of as withdrawn.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) Nesarikar