← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/4566/2015other disposed off

Anjali W/O Vinod Kumar Agarwal v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

2015-12-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ranjit More.,Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.L. Achliya2 pages

Sr.No. 38 WP 4566.15 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4566 OF 2015 Mrs. Anjali w/o. Vinod Kumar Agarwal ..Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and anr.

..Respondents Ms. Sneha Singh i/b. Mr. Ashok M. Saraogi, advocate for the petitioner. Ms. S. V. Sonavane, APP for the State.

Mr. Akhil Kapade, advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM : RANJIT MORE & V. L. ACHLIYA, JJ.

DATE : 8th DECEMBER, 2015.

P. C. :

Heard learned counsel and learned APP appearing for the respective parties.

2.

The petition is filed for quashing the proceedings of the Sessions Case No. 270 of 2014 pending on the file of the Hon'ble Sessions Court by consent. The said case arises out of registration of FIR No.19 of 2014 with the Khar Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 406, 420 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. 3.

We have gone through the FIR. The FIR alleges that the petitioner under the pretext of giving employment to respondent No.2complainant extracted an amount of Rs.10,00,000/- from her and took Shubhada S Kadam 1/2

Sr.No. 38 WP 4566.15 her to Dubai and illegally detained her in the hotel and forced her to have sexual intercourse with several persons between 3rd June, 2013 and 27th June, 2013. We find the offence alleged against the petitioner is serious and heinous one and it is against the society. We therefore refuse to entertain the petition. The petition, accordingly, stands dismissed.

4.

Be that as it may, earlier the petitioner had filed a petition bearing No.2283 of 2014 for quashing the subject FIR. However, the same was withdrawn as the Court was not inclined to entertain the same and, thereafter, the petitioner has filed the instant petition. [V. L. ACHLIYA, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.] Shubhada S Kadam 2/2