Vijay Vithal Gudulkar And ORS. v. Security Guards Board For Greater Mumbai And Thane District. And ANR.

18.WP.421-18.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition NO. 421 OF 2018 Vijay Vithal Gudulkar And Ors.

...Petitioners

Versus

Security Guards Board For Greater Mumbai & Thane District, And Anr.

...Respondents

....

Ms. Ranjana Todankar, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. Meelan Topkar, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. S. Babar, AGP, for Respondent No.2.

....

CORAM : R.M. BORDE & R. G. KETKAR, JJ.

DATE : 19th JANUARY, 2018 P.C.

The learned Counsel appearing for respondent No.1 Board states, on instructions, that some discrepancies are noticed in the applications tendered by the petitioners to the Board. It would be open for the petitioners to approach the Board and remove the discrepancies or tender necessary explanation.

2.

The petitioners undertake to approach respondent No.1 Board within a period of two weeks from today. Respondent No.1 Board, on removal of discrepancies by the petitioners, shall take 1 / 2

18.WP.421-18.doc appropriate decision in the matter and issue necessary orders as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of approach of the petitioners to the Board. 3.

With the directions as above, Writ Petition is disposed of. (R. G. KETKAR, J.) (R.M. BORDE, J.) Deshmane (PS) 2 / 2