Shri.Padmakar Rajaram Zarkar v. Shri.Milind Chandrakant Sawant

2..doc DDR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1866 OF 2017 IN SECOND APPEAL ST.NO. 31676 OF 2017 Padmakar Rajaram Zarkar ..Applicant.

vs.

Milind Chandrakant Sawant & anr.

..Respondents ....

Shri R.R. Lanjekar for applicant.

None for respondents.

....

CORAM : M.S.KARNIK, J.

DATE : 9th OCTOBER, 2019 P.C. :

Heard learned counsel for the applicant.

2.

Learned counsel for the applicant states that he has already served the counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents who had filed a caveat on behalf of the respondent. 3.

This is an application for condonation of delay of 104 in filing the Second Appeal. The respondents are duly served. 1/2

2..doc 4.

For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay is condoned.

5.

The application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 6.

The application is disposed of.

(M.S.KARNIK, J.) Digitally signed by Diksha Rane Date:

2019.10.09 18:09:23 +0530 Diksha Rane 2/2