City And Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. v. Mr. Siddharth Vijay Jaiswal

3 caw 202.18.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 202 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO.9283 OF 2015 City and Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. ....Applicant In the matter of Shri Siddharth Vijay Jaiswal ....Petitioner versus Union of India and ors.

....Respondents Ms. Prerna S. Adhav i/b. Mr. Jurispritus, advocates for the applicant. Mr. Abhijit Singh i/b. Mr. Anil Ahuja, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. S. R. Ganabawale, advocate for the respondent Nos.14 to 19. CORAM : RANJIT MORE & PRAKASH D. NAIK, J J.

DATE : 2nd FEBRUARY, 2018.

P. C. :

The respondent CIDCO has filed this application for leave to file a reply. The civil application was necessitated as the applicant could not file reply within the time stipulated by this Court under order dated 24th July, 2017.

2.

The applicant-CIDCO, by making averments in paragraphs 2 and 3 have explained the circumstances in which the affidavit-in-reply could not be filed within the stipulated period of two weeks. The explanation is satisfactory. The application is, accordingly, allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) and is disposed of as such. Shubhada S Kadam 1/2

3 caw 202.18.doc 3.

The Registry is directed to take the reply of the respondent No.6-CIDCO on record on the above petition, if filed , within a period of one week from today.

[PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.] Shubhada S Kadam 2/2