Jagannath Revanasidha Daraphale And ORS v. Shri Chandrakant Jayaram Guddewar, The Commissioner And ANR

909 cp 78 & 79.14 & 515.13.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 78 OF 2014 Jagannath Revanasidha Daraphale and ors.

.....Petitioners versus Shri Chandrakant Jayaram Guddewar and anr.

.....Respondents with CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 79 OF 2014 Nagappa Tukappa Chougule and ors.

.....Petitioners versus Shri Chandrakant Jayaram Guddewar and anr.

.....Respondents with CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 515 OF 2013 Shri Shankarrao Govindrao Patil .....Petitioner versus Solapur Municipal Corporation and ors.

.....Respondents Mr. Milind R. Deshpande, advocate for the petitioner in all the petitions. Mr. Dilip Bodake, advocate for the respondent No.1. Ms. K. R. Kulkarni, AGP for the State.

CORAM : RANJIT MORE & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.

DATE : 5th DECEMBER, 2018.

P. C. :

Mr. Bodake, learned counsel for the respondent No.1 makes a statement that the order in respect of which breach is alleged is stayed by the Apex Court. This statement is not disputed by Mr. Deshpande, learned counsel for the petitioners.

Shubhada S Kadam 1/2

909 cp 78 & 79.14 & 515.13.doc 2.

In view of the above, there is no question of contempt at this stage. The contempt petitions are disposed of. 3.

In the event, SLP filed by the respondent No.1 is dismissed, the petitioners are at liberty to file fresh contempt petition. [REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.] Shubhada S Kadam 2/2