Shri Sanjay Sarangdhar Gaikwad v. The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. The Secretary And ORS.
Vina khadpe sr.27.cp.35.2018.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.35 OF 2018 Kum. Vijaya Namdeo Gaikwad
...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretary & ors.
...Respondents
WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.47 OF 2018 Shri Amol Raosaheb Patil
...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretary & ors.
...Respondents
WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.50 OF 2018 Smt. Sharada Dhondiram Patil
...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretary & ors.
...Respondents
WITH CONTEMPT PETITION (ST.) NO.710 OF 2018 Shri. Vinod Bhausaheb Bolij
...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretary & ors.
...Respondents
1/3
Vina khadpe sr.27.cp.35.2018.doc WITH CONTEMPT PETITION (ST.) NO.711 OF 2018 Shri Prakash Kashinath Patil
...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretary & ors.
...Respondents
WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.475 OF 2017 Shri Ajay Nandu Hole
...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretary & ors.
...Respondents
WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.477 OF 2017 Shri Somnath Sabaji Waditake
...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretary & ors.
...Respondents
WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.476 OF 2017 Shri Sanjay Sarangdhar Gaikwad
...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretary & ors.
...Respondents
---------- Mr.N.V. Bandiwadekar a/w Mr.S.A. Mane i/b. Ms.Ashwini N. Bandiwadekar and Ms. Neha N. Bandiwadekar for the petitioners in all contempt petitions.
2/3
Vina khadpe sr.27.cp.35.2018.doc Mr. S. B. Kalel, AGP for respondent nos.1 and 2 in all contempt petitions.
Mr. D.I.S. Mulla a/w Mr. Milind Deshmukh for respondent nos.3 and 4 in all contempt petitions.
Mr. Bhausaheb Karle, Secretary, Rayat Shikshan Sanstha present. ---------- CORAM :
B.R. GAVAI AND DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, JJ.
DATE :
16th APRIL 2019.
P.C. :
1.
All above Contempt Petitions are filed against officials on the ground that they have committed contempt of this Court by not complying with directions given in the impugned order dated 19th April 2017.
2.
Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners on instructions submits that the said impugned order is now complied with.
3.
Nothing survives for adjudication in these Petitions, so all Contempt Petitions stand disposed of.
[DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] 3/3