← Library
Bombay High CourtABA/2190/2018others disposed off

Nandlal Vishwanath Maurya v. The State Of Maharashtra

2019-04-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari2 pages

aba.2190-2018.doc Dond

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2190 OF 2018 Nandlal Vishwanath Maurya.

..Applicant Vs The State of Maharashtra ..Respondents WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1724 OF 2018 Dr. Anupkumar Ramnarayan Singh & Anr.

..Applicants Vs The State of Maharashtra ..Respondents ----- Mr. C.K. Talekar the Applicants in both ABAs. Ms. Rutuja Ambekar, APP for the State.

CORAM : A.S.GADKARI, J.

DATE : 16th April 2019.

P.C.:

1] Heard the learned counsel for the applicants and the learned APP for the State. Perused the record of investigation. 2] By Orders dated 25.10.2018 and 29.8.2019, the the respective applicants were granted interim relief and were directed to attend the Investigating Officer on stipulated dates, to join the process of investigation.

1/2

aba.2190-2018.doc The learned APP on instructions submitted that, in pursuance of above Order, the applicants attended the Investigating Officer and have cooperated in the process of investigation. 3] The record indicates that, co-accused namely Rakesh Gupta who has been attributed with same and/or similar role in the present crime has been granted pre-arrest bail by this Court by its Order dated 6th August 2018. Perusal of the record would indicate that, the applicants herein have played little lesser role than Rakesh Gupta in the prersent crime. The applicants are therefore entitled to be protected by pre-arrest bail on the ground of parity.

4] In view thereof, interim relief granted by Orders dated 25th October 2018 and 29th August 2018 respectively are hereby confirmed. However, the condition to attend the Investigating Officer is waived. 6] Both Applications are allowed in the aforesaid terms. (A.S.GADKARI, J.) 2/2