The State Of Maharashtra And ORS. v. Chandrakant Anandrao Jadhav And ANR.

Yadav V.G.

16.wp.13291.16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 13291 OF 2016 The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .... Petitioners

Versus

Chandrakant s/o Anandrao Jadhav & Anr. .... Respondents • Mr. A. A. Kumbhakoni, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Akshay Shinde i/by. C.P.Yadav, AGP for Petitioners/State. • Mr. V.R.Patil for Respondent No.1.

CORAM

:

R. M. BORDE AND A. S. GADKARI, JJ.

DATE :

MARCH 08, 2017.

P.C.

.

The learned Counsel appearing for Respondent No.1 agrees that he will not insist for the interim order as has been passed by the Tribunal as well as does not press the Contempt Proceedings initiated before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal.

2.

In view of the concession made, the order of interim relief granted by the Tribunal as well as the Contempt Proceedings pending before the Tribunal are quashed.

Yadav V.G.

16.wp.13291.16 3.

The Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal is directed to decide the pending Original Application No. 1038 of 2016 on its own merits, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within the period of three months from today, without being influenced by the interference caused by this Court in the instant writ petition. [A. S. GADKARI, J.] [R. M. BORDE, J.]