Priyanka Vinod Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra

Sr.No.1 WP 4126.16 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4126 OF 2016 Smt. Priyanka Vinod Patil ..Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr. Ghanshyam Upadhyay i/b. Law Juris, advocate for the petitioner. Mrs. M. M. Deshmukh, APP for the State.

CORAM : RANJIT MORE, DR. SHALINI PHANSALKARJOSHI, J J.

DATE : 29th NOVEMBER, 2016.

P. C. :

The petitioner by this petition is seeking limited relief to direct learned Special Judge/Addition Sessions Judge-5, Nashik to hear and decide the her bail application along with bail applications of the co-accused. Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the hearing of the bail applications of the co-accused is scheduled on 30th November, 2016. However, the petitioner's bail application is adjourned to 3rd December, 2016.

2.

Since the bail application of the petitioner as well as the coaccused arises out of the same CR, in our opinion, the interests of justice would be subserved by directing learned Special Judge/Addition Sessions Judge-5, Nashik to hear the petitioner's bail application along with the bail applications of the co-accused which is scheduled to be heard on 30th November, 2016. Ordered accordingly. Shubhada S Kadam 1/2

Sr.No.1 WP 4126.16 3.

Needless to mention that we have not gone into the merits of the matter and learned Special Judge/learned Additional Sessions Judge -5, Nashik shall decide the petitioner's bail application on its own merits and in accordance with law.

4.

In the light of above order, the writ petition is disposed of. 5.

All concerned to act upon a copy of this order duly authenticated by the Registry of this Court.

(DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI) [RANJIT MORE, J.] Shubhada S Kadam 2/2