Mr. Arun Eknath Baviskar And ANR. v. The State Of Maharashtra

6.wp.405.2015.doc dik

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 405 OF 2015 Mr Arun Eknath Baviskar & Anr.

...Petitioners

vs The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

...Respondents

.....

Mr Uday P. Warunjikar for the Petitioners Mr N.C.Walimbe AGP for Respondent No.1.

Mr Jayprakash S. Kapre for Respondent Nos.2 to 8. .....

CORAM : R.M.BORDE & R.G.KETKAR, JJ.

JANUARY 22, 2018.

P.C. :

There is alternate remedy available for redressel of the grievances raised in the Petition. Keeping the option of Petitioner open to avail the alternate remedy, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

It is clarified that the objections raised in the present Petition are specifically kept open for consideration in the appeal. The Appellate Authority while considering the Pg 1 of 2

6.wp.405.2015.doc application seeking condonation of delay which may be presented with the appeal, the aspect of time spent for prosecuting remedy of this Writ Petition shall be considered. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs. ( R.G.KETKAR, J. ) ( R.M.BORDE, J.) Pg 2 of 2