Jyotsna Satish Jogal v. Anil Gangaram Todmal And ANR.

1/2 9 CAS 270-20.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 270 of 2020 IN SECOND APPEAL ST. NO. 30665 of 2018 Jyotsna Satish Jogal .. Applicant

Versus

Anil Gangaram Todmal & Anr .. Respondents ...

Mrs.Jai Kanade i/b Ms.Shruti Tulpule and Ms.Shivani Samel for the applicant.

Mr.Saurabh Oka for respondent nos.1 and 2.

CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J.

DATED : 5th MARCH 2020 P.C:- The said application seeks to condone the delay of 16 days in filing the Second Appeal. The reason for the delay is found in paragraph nos.5 and 6 of the application. On perusal of the said paragraphs and the averments therein, it is clear that the delay caused in approaching the Court at a belated stage was on account of certain unavoidable circumstances stated in paragraph no.6.

Tilak

2/2 9 CAS 270-20.doc The delay being satisfactorily explained and bonafide, deserves to be condoned.

Resultantly, Civil Application is allowed by condoning the delay.

Registry is directed to register the Second Appeal and list the same for admission.

SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J Tilak