Renuka Dadasaheb Jadkar v. Dadasaheb Raghunath Jadakar

WP541_16.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.541 OF 2016 (Renuka Dadasaheb Jadkar Vs. Dadasaheb Raghunath Jadakar) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances,Court's orders, or directions, and Registrar's Orders Court's or Judge's orders None present.

CORAM : R. G. KETKAR, J.

DATE : 19TH JANUARY, 2017 P.C.:

None appears for the petitioner.

2.

Perused the orders dated 31.08.2016 and 05.01.2017. On 31.08.2016, none appeared for the petitioner. It was accordingly adjourned to the C.M.I.S. date i.e. 05.01.2017. Even on 05.01.2017, none appeared for the petitioner and it was adjourned to 19.01.2017 under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, none appears for the petitioner. It seems that petitioner is not interested in pursuing this Petition. Hence, Petition is dismissed in default. (R. G. KETKAR, J.) Minal Parab 1/1