Harinath Shivnandan Vishwakarma And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra

35 WP 4143 OF 2016.doc vks

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4143 OF 2016 Harinath Shivnandan Vishwakarma and anr .... Petitioners V/s.

State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Mr. Pankaj Dwivedi, for the Petitioner.

Mr. J. P. Yagnik, APP for the Respondent State. CORAM : RANJIT MORE & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : 14th DECEMBER, 2016.

P.C. :

1.

Heard Mr. Pankaj Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. J. P. Yagnik, learned APP for the State. 2.

By this petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to respondent No.1 to register F.I.R. on the basis of petitioner's complaints dated 16.11.2016 and 29.11.2016, annexed at Exhibit "A" and "B", respectively.

3.

Mr. Yagnik, learned APP, on instructions, makes statement that so far as complaint dated 16.11.2016 is concerned, F.I.R. is already registered. In support of his statement, he tendered a letter dated 1/2

35 WP 4143 OF 2016.doc 12.12.2016, given by Senior Inspector of Police, Varsova Police Station. The same is taken on record and marked "X" for identification. 3.

So far as another complaint dated 21.11.2016, Mr. Yagnik, learned APP submits that as on today F.I.R. is not registered as preliminary enquiry is in progress. He also states that the enquiry will be concluded within a period of two weeks and appropriate decision would taken and the same would be communicated to the petitioner. Statement is accepted.

4.

In the light of above statement, the grievance of the petitioner no more survives. The petition, is disposed of accordingly. [DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR JOSHI, J.] [RANJIT MORE,J.] 2/2