Ramesh Dinkar Ghare v. Mrs. Anupama S. Gunjal

5. CAW 3322.15.doc JPP

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3322 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 9986 OF 2014 Anupama S. More alias Anupama S. Gunjal.

... Applicant.

V/s.

Mr. Ramesh Dinkar Ghare.

... Respondent.

Mr. Mahesh Rawool i/b. Avinash Avhad for the Applicant & Orig. Respondent.

None for the Orig. Petitioner.

CORAM : N.M. Jamdar, J.

08 December, 2016.

P.C. :- On 22 November 2016 following order was passed :- " None appears for the Respondent. The learned Counsel for the Applicant states that the amount of compensation has also not been paid according to the order. Before the Petitioner is granted this liberty to proceed as per clause (4) of the order dated 14 July 2015, by way of indulgence stand over to 8 December 2016. If the order is not

5. CAW 3322.15.doc complied with before the next date, the Petitioner will be at liberty to proceed as per the order dated 14 July 2015."

2.

None appears for the Respondent to controvert the assertion of the Applicant that the order dated 14 July 2015 has not been complied with. Therefore, liberty is granted to the Applicant to proceed as per Clause (4) of the order dated 14 July 2015. Civil Application is disposed of.

(N.M. Jamdar, J.)