Satish Dnyaneshwar Bodake v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR.

1 / 2 04.APEAL-1152-22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1152 OF 2022 Satish Dnyaneshwar Bodake .... Appellant versus State of Maharashtra and Anr.

.... Respondents .......

• Mr. Sachin H. Deokar, Advocate for Appellant. • Smt. M. R. Tidke, APP for the State/Respondent No.1.

CORAM

: SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 28th NOVEMBER, 2022 P.C. :

1.

After arguing for some time, when I expressed my disinclination to grant relief in this Appeal, learned counsel for the Appellant prays for unconditional withdrawal of this Appeal. He submits that directions be issued to the trial Court to consider his Bail Application expeditiously, if and when he is arrested or surrendered.

2.

The request is reasonable. The Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn. If the Appellant is arrested or he surrenders, and if Shabnoor

2 / 2 04.APEAL-1152-22.odt he makes the Bail Application with prior notice to the other side as well as to the victim, such Bail Application shall be decided expeditiously. With these observations, the Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn unconditionally and is disposed of accordingly. (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)