Dr. Rajnikant N. Pandya v. Maharashtra Medical Council, Mumbai And ANR.

1/2 prod.3-wp.11354.2014.doc nsc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.11354 OF 2014 Dr.Rajnikant N. Pandya.

...Petitioner

v/s.

Maharashtra Medical Council, Mumbai and Anr.

...Respondents

--- Mr.M.S.Karnik a/w Ms.Ketki Gadkari i/b Mr.Prashant Gawali, for the Petitioner.

Mr.Rahul Nerlekar, for the Respondent No.1.

Mr.V.S.Gokhale, AGP for the Respondent No.2.

--- CORAM: A. S. OKA & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.

DATED : 8th JULY, 2015.

P.C.

Not on board. Taken on board.

1.

The order dated 9th June, 2015 passed in Criminal Revision Application No.289 of 2006 is placed on record. A perusal of the order shows that the Criminal Revision Application No.289 of 2006 has been disposed of by compounding the offence.

2.

The order impugned in this petition dated 25th October, 2013 passed by the Maharashtra Medical Council, Mumbai is a self operative

2/2 prod.3-wp.11354.2014.doc order which directs that the punishment of suspension of Registration will continue till the decision of the Criminal Revision Application No.289 of 2006. As a result of the disposal of the Criminal Revision Application No.289 of 2006, now the suspension of Registration of the petitioner has come to an end.

3.

Therefore, the first respondent will have to take consequential action on the footing that the order of suspension has ceased to operate. 4.

With the above observations, we dispose of the petition by granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge the impugned order on merits by adopting appropriate proceedings in accordance with law. (REVATI MOHITE DERE,J.) (A.S. OKA,J.)