Rushi Bahuuddeshiya Shaikshanik Vikas Sanstha Through President J. V. Naikude v. Maharashtra State Of Board Of Nursing And Paramedical Education Through Registrar And ANR

902.wp12212.19.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 12212 OF 2019 Rushi Bahuuddeshiya Shaikshanik Vikas Sanstha, Dwara.

...Petitioners.

Versus

The Maharashtra State Board of Nursing and Paramedical Education & ors.

...Respondents.

Mr. R.D. Soni a/w. Mr. V.R. Kasle i/b. Ram and Co., advocate for petitioners.

Ms. K.N. Salunke, AGP for State.

CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, JJ.

DATE : NOVEMBER 28, 2019.

P.C.:

Heard for some time. The Petitioners claim that all compliance have been made. The respondents dispute this. They are seeking time to file reply affidavit. From the facts, it appears that having 100 bedded hospital is mandatory. The affidavit given by Expert Director in support shows non-application of mind. We are therefore, not willing to intervene at this stage.

However, the petitioners claim that they have paid Talwalkar

902.wp12212.19.doc necessary fees and twice inspection have been undertaken. We therefore, direct the respondents to inform the petitioners their decision, if any, within 2 weeks. With this direction, we dispose of petition.

(SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J) (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J) Talwalkar