Rajendra Pandurang Chaudhari v. The State Of Maharashtra

28-APPP-1369-2018.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. NO. 1369 OF 2018 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1537 OF 2012 Rajendra Pandurang Chaudhari ...

Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

...

Respondents .....

Mr. Krutik Veera i/b Mr.Rohan R. Sonawane, for the Applicant. Mr. A. A. Palkar, APP, for the Respondent-State. Mr. P. D. Yerunkar, A. S. I., Shrinagar Police Station, present. .....

CORAM : PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.

DATED : 8th APRIL, 2024.

P.C.

This is an application seeking return of an amount of Rs. 1,00,000/- deposited by the applicant-accused voluntarily at the time of granting of bail by this Court on 17th October, 2012. Para 5 of the said order reads thus;

"5 In view of the allegation with respect to the offence punishable under section 406 of the IPC, the learned advocate for the applicant submits that the applicant is ready to deposit an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- with the Investigating Agency for securing the alleged loss of her property by the First Informant. He also submits that the applicant is ready to abide by any other conditions, as may be imposed by the Court, while releasing him on bail." REKHA PRAKASH PATIL REKHA PRAKASH PATIL Date: 2024.04.10 16:18:13 +0530 Rekha Patil

28-APPP-1369-2018.doc It is apparent from the said order that the applicant voluntarily deposited Rs.1,00,000/- with the Investigating Agency for securing the alleged loss of the property. There was no direction by this Court to deposit an amount of Rs.1,00,000/-. It appears that the applicant has been acquitted by the trial Court on 5th July, 2018 as none of the charges could be proved since the victim didn't support the case of the prosecution. In view of the above, the application does not have any merit and hence, dismissed.

Liberty to the applicant to prosecute his remedy in accordance with law.

[PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.] Rekha Patil