Naresh Lachmandas Aswani v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Govt. Pleader And ORS.

11.CRA65_2015 & Ors..doc Vidya Amin

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No. 65 OF 2015 WITH CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No. 146 OF 2015 WITH CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION No. 147 OF 2015 Naresh Lachmandas Aswani ... Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra through the GP & Ors.

... Respondents None present for the applicant.

Mr. A.R. Patil, AGP for respondent nos. 1, 3 and 4. Mr. Arvind Aswani i/b. Jagdish G. Reddy (Aradwad), Advocate for respondent no. 2.

Ms. Dhanashree Gaikaiwari i/b. M/s. Bilawala & Co., Advocate for respondent nos. 5A to 5C.

Mr. Samish Gala a/w. Jigar Shah i/b. Markand Gandhi & Co., Advocate for respondent no. 7.

CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.

DATE: 4th June, 2018.

P.C.:

When the matters were called out, none present for the applicant, hence the matters were kept back.

2.

In the afternoon session again when the matters were called out, the learned counsel for the applicant is not present. 3.

These Civil Applications are directed against the common order 1 / 2

11.CRA65_2015 & Ors..doc order dated 24th December, 2014 passed by the learned Judge of the City Civil Court, Borivili Division, Dindoshi wherein in view of the order on preliminary issue, S.C. Suit Nos. 362 of 2007, 363 of 2007 and 364 of 2007 were dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 4.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for respondent No. 7/original defendant No. 7 that the suits are dismissed finally and therefore, the order is to be challenged by filing First Appeal. 5.

In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for respondent No. 7 and so also as the learned counsel for the applicant is not present, all these Civil Revision Applications are dismissed.

(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) 2 / 2