Shri. Sanjay Sanket Ujagare v. The State Of Maharashtra Thru The Secretary, School Edu. And Sports Dept. And ORS
Sneha Chavan 1 48-WP-2334-23 and ors (2).doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2334 OF 2023 Shri. Jitesh Uttam Kamble
...Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra Thru The Secretary, School Education And Sports Department And Ors
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2332 OF 2023 SNEHA NITIN CHAVAN Smt. Manju Shivendra Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra Thru Sec.
School Education Dept. And Ors
...Respondents
SNEHA NITIN CHAVAN Date: 2024.01.23 13:19:06 +0530 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2333 OF 2023 Shri. Sanjay Sanket Ujagare
...Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra Thru The Secretary, School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2335 OF 2023 Shri. Hitesh Vira Parmar
...Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra Thru The Secretary, School Education And Sports Dept. And Ors
...Respondents
Sneha Chavan 2 48-WP-2334-23 and ors (2).doc **** Mr. Prashant Bhavake for the Petitioners.
Mr. V.M. Mali, AGP for the Respondent/State.
**** CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND M.M.SATHAYE, JJ.
DATE : 11 JANUARY 2024 P.C.:
.
Heard learned counsel for the parties. The table showing necessary details for passing common order, are as below. Writ Petition Name of the Working as Proposal pending before Respondent Petitioner No.
Authority 2334/2023 Jitesh Uttam Kamble Laboratory Assistant Resp. No. 4 Dy.
Director of Education, Mumbai Region, Mumbai 2332/2023 Manju Shivendra Singh Junior Clerk Resp. No. 5 Education Inspector, North Division, Mumbai for forwarding to Resp. No.
4 Dy. Director of Education, Mumbai Region, Mumbai 2333/2023 Sanjay Sanket Ujagare Junior Clerk Resp. No. 4 Dy.
Director of Education, Mumbai Region, Mumbai 2335/2023 Hitesh Vira Parmar Junior Clerk Resp. No. 4 Dy.
Director of Education, Mumbai Region, Mumbai
Sneha Chavan 3 48-WP-2334-23 and ors (2).doc 2.
Petitioners - Employees are seeking direction to above Respondent Authorities to decide their pending proposals for allotting Shalarth ID to them. It is submitted by learned counsel for the Petitioners, on instructions, that their respective Respondent managements are supporting their cause till today, and we proceed on the basis of said statement.
3.
It is submitted that the Petitioners' proposals are pending from August 2021 in WP/2332/2023 and from October 2022 in remaining petitions.
4.
In view of said pendency of the proposals, the respective Respondent Authorities are directed to communicate their proposed grounds of rejection/s to the respective Respondent/ Educational Institutes, if any, within a period of 3 weeks from today. The respective Respondent/Educational Institutes shall thereafter submit their explanation to the proposed grounds of rejection, along with supporting material including case laws/ orders of this Court, Government Resolutions etc, if relied upon.
5.
The respective Respondent Authorities are thereafter directed to decide within 8 weeks, the pending proposals of the Petitioners by dealing with the explanation/s and material submitted by the Respondent/Educational Institutes and pass reasoned orders. 6.
We have not expressed any opinion on the Petitioners'
Sneha Chavan 4 48-WP-2334-23 and ors (2).doc proposals and the same shall be decided on their own merits in accordance with law. Needless to mention that if the respective Respondent Authorities proceed to grant proposal for Shalarth IDs, the aforesaid procedure/directions will not apply. The contention of the Petitioners that once approval is granted, Shalarth ID cannot be rejected, is kept open.
7.
The writ petitions are disposed of in the aforesaid terms. ( M.M. SATHAYE, J.) ( NITIN JAMDAR, J.)