← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/12921/2017disposed off

Shri. Madhavlal Narayanlal Pittie v. Bharat Kishor Gupta Of Mumbai

2017-12-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni2 pages

1/2 8-wp.12921.2017.doc nsc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.12921 OF 2017 Madhavlal Narayanlal Pittie

...Petitioner

Versus

Bharat Kishore Gupta

...Respondent

Mr.Zal Andhyarujina a/w Mr.R.S.Tiwari, Mr.B.N.Shukla and Mr.Harsh Meghani i/b B.N.Shukla and Co., for the Petitioner. Mr.Rajesh Jain a/w Ms.Usha R., Mr.Ameya Mahajan and Ms.Ankita Sovani, for the Respondent.

CORAM : G.S.KULKARNI, J.

DATE : 22nd DECEMBER, 2017 P.C. :

1.

Mr.Zal Andhyarujina, learned counsel for the petitioner makes a statement that the issue with regard to the electricity and water connection can be resolved inasmuch as, already the electricity supply as also water supply is available at the premises. It is for the respondent to apply for the electricity meter for which the petitioner has no objection. As also for the water connection, it is for the respondent to make appropriate arrangement to connect the water supply to the respondent's premises. 2.

Mr.Jain, learned counsel for the respondent submits that the respondent is agreeable to the suggestions and that the respondent will do

2/2 8-wp.12921.2017.doc the needful to apply for a electricity meter and obtain the electricity supply as per the Rules of the Supply Company. As regards the water connection Mr.Jain states that necessary steps would be taken by the respondent to connect the water connection and bring the supply to the petitioner's suit premises.

3.

In view of the above consensus, further adjudication of this petition is not called for. The petition is accordingly disposed of in the above terms. No costs.

4.

Needless to observe that if the respondent applies for a electricity connection so also for a water connection and if the respondent requires a formal 'no objection' from the petitioner, the same shall be provided by the petitioner, without prejudice to the rights and contentions in the pending proceedings before the Small Causes Court. It is further needless to observe that the above arrangement is without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties.

G. S. KULKARNI, J.