Mr. Devendra Ramesh Limaye v. Insurance Regulatory And Development Authority Of India New Delhi Thru Chairman

40-wp-13784.2018.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 13784 OF 2018 Mr. Devendra Ramesh Limaye ... Petitioner

Versus

Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India, New Delhi and Ors.

...

Respondents Mr.Mahindra Deshmukh I/by Mr. Rajkumar Pol for the Petitioner. Mr.N.C. Walimbe, AGP for the respondent State. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKAKRI & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATE :

DECEMBER 12, 2018 P.C.:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2.

Petitioner is seeking licence to operate as licensed surveyor for the insurance companies. It is contended that though he has undergone necessary training, respondent no. 4 is avoiding to sign on undertaking of trainer surveyor/surveyor firm for the petitioner. The document on which the petitioner needs certificate of respondent no. 4 is placed on page 31 of the petition. 3.

According to the petitioner, respondent no. 4 is recognized by respondent no. 2 for the purpose of the said training. nilegaonkar 1/2

40-wp-13784.2018.odt 4.

It appears that the petitioner has already applied for such licence and thereafter on 22/1/2017 he was informed that the completion certificate from the trainer is essential. After that certificate is submitted along with new licence application, his request for permitting him to work as licenced surveyor and loss assessor can be looked into. Petitioner has thereafter not made any complaint either to respondent no.1 or respondent no.2 or even to respondent no. 4.

5.

In these circumstances, we find that interest of justice can be met with by keeping all the contentions of the parties open and permitting the petitioner to approach respondent no.2 with his grievance. If the representation of the petitioner is received by respondent no.2 within four weeks from today, respondent no. 2 shall pass suitable orders upon it within next eight weeks. 6.

With these directions and with opportunity to the petitioner to approach this court again if his grievance subsists even thereafter, we dispose of the writ petition.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) nilegaonkar 2/2