← Library
Bombay High CourtCRA/117/2017disposed off

M/S. J And J Associates, Thru. Partner Kamlesh Jhala v. Mrs Leena Chaban Tonde And ORS

2019-01-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice K.K. Tated2 pages

36 cra117-17.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.117 OF 2017 J & J Associates .. Applicant V/s.

Leena Chaban Tonde and Ors.

.. Respondents WITH CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.168 OF 2018 Kalpana Suhas Merchant .. Applicant V/s.

Leena Chaban Tonde and Ors.

.. Respondents Mr.Kaustubh Thipse I/b Mr.Parag Tilak for the applicant in CRA No.117/2017 Mr.Vineet Naik, Sr.Advocate I/b Mr.Suneet K. Tyagi for the applicant in CRA No.168/2017 and for respondent no.9 in CRA No.117/2017 Mr.P.S.Dani, Sr.Counsel I/b Mr.P.G.Chavan for the respondent no.3 in CRA No.117/2017 Mr.Rajesh S. Jadhav for the for the respondent no.1 Mr.Makarand B. Sawant for the respondent no.10 in CRA No.117/2017 and for respondent no.9 in CRA No.168/2018

CORAM:

K.K. TATED, J DATED :

JANUARY 21, 2019 Mohite 1/2

36 cra117-17.doc P.C. :

Heard.

By these Civil Revision Applications, Applicant is challenging the order dated 14.11.2016 passed by 4th Additional Judge and Small Causes Court and Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune below Exhibit-1 in Special Civil Suit No. 1387 of 2012 holding that suit filed by the plaintiff is within limitation. That order was passed under section 9A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

In view of subsequent development, I.e. deletion of section 9A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, nothing survives in the present Civil Revision Applications.

Hence, Both the Civil Revision Applications stand disposed of as infructuous.

No order as to costs.

(K.K. TATED, J.) Mohite 2/2