Mr. Mubarak Shahadur Tadvi v. The Dist. Selection Board, And ANR.

916-WP.147.2013.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 147 OF 2013 Mr. Mubarak Shahadur Tadvi } Petitioner versus The District Selection Board, } Thane Zilla Parishad and Ors.

} Respondents Ms. Vaishali K. Jagdale for the petitionerabsent. Mr. S. P. Thorat for respondent no. 2.

CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & B. P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.

DATED :- FEBRUARY 3, 2017 P.C. :- 1.

The writ petition is pending in this court from 2012. Rather it was filed on 11th December, 2012. It was on board on 6th February, 2013, on which date, notice was issued returnable on 26th March, 2013. Though the notices were duly served prior to the returnable date, since thereafter, what appears is that the matter has been listed, but could not be taken up or whenever it was taken up, an adjournment application was made and entertained. On 6th December, 2013, this court noticed that in the meanwhile some appointment was made. Therefore, the selected candidate was directed to be impleaded as party respondent. Post J.V.Salunke,PA

916-WP.147.2013.doc such amendment, the writ petition has appeared for admission, but on some ground or the other, including consent application for adjournment, the matter remained on our file and for nearly four and half years.

2.

In these circumstances, we do not grant any further adjournment nor we wait for any counsel to appear and argue the case. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. (B.P.COLABAWALLA, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) J.V.Salunke,PA