Naresh R. Kamath v. The State Of Maharashtra

56.ba2468.16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2468 OF 2016 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1014 OF 2016 IN BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2468 OF 2016 Nandan Vishwanath Moore.

... Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Mr. Rajendra B. Mokashi, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Rahul A. Hande, advocate for intervenor.

Mr. Deepak Thakare, APP for the State.

CORAM:

SMT.SADHANA S.JADHAV,J.

DATE : JANUARY 4, 2017.

P.C.

At the outset, Learned APP on instruction submits that the examination-in-chief of the complainant is already recorded and the matter is posted for cross-examination. In view of this, it would not be appropriate Talwalkar 1/2

56.ba2468.16 to consider the application seeking enlargement on bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Hence, the application stands dismissed.

The learned Metropolitan Magistrate seized with the case No. 1036/PW/2016 is hereby requested to conclude the recording of evidence as far as possible within 3 months from the date of this order. The applicant shall not seek any adjournment. Office to communicate this order to the concerned Court forthwith.

The application is disposed of accordingly.

In view of this, the intervention application bearing No. 1014 of 2016 is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

(SMT.SADHANA S.JADHAV, J.) Talwalkar 2/2