Mr. Siddheshwar Mogalappa Kamurthi v. 1. The State Ofmaharashtra And ORS.

WP.11579/2012(4) mnm

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 11579 OF 2012 S.M. Kamurti

...Petitioner

Vs.

B.N.C.M.C & Ors.

...Respondents

Mr. Dr. Ramdas P. Sabban, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. N.R. Bubna, Advocate for Respondent No.3 Mr. A.I. Patel, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & M.S. KARNIK, JJ.

DATED : 8TH JUNE, 2016 P.C. :

1.

Parties through their Counsel. Learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent Corporation has filed affidavit in reply. Having considered the submission made in the affidavit in reply, it is revealed that the Officers of the Corporation have taken all possible steps in accordance with law for demolition of the construction in question. An assurance has been given that further, action will be taken in accordance with law. In view of the above steps being taken by the Corporation and the assurance given in our considered

WP.11579/2012(4) view nothing survive in this Petition. We dispose off the Petition recording the stand of the Corporation. 2.

The Petition is disposed off accordingly.

(M.S. KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)