Vencil Roy Miranda v. The Addl. Chief Secretary And ANR.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4937 OF 2018 Vencil Roy Miranda .. Petitioner Vs.

The Additional Chief Secretary & Anr.

.. Respondents  Mr. Vinay J. Bhanushali, appointed Counsel for the Petitioner.  Ms. S.D. Shinde, APP for State.

CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE & M.M. SATHAYE, JJ.

th MARCH, 2023.

DATE : 27 P.C. :

1.

Heard.

2.

Perused the affidavit-in-reply filed by the Jail Superintendent. It shows that the respondents have complied with all the directions issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and National Human Rights Commission and in our considered opinion, such compliance serves the purpose of the petition. The petition is, therefore, disposed of as having served its purpose. We, however, direct the Disciplinary Authority to conclude the disciplinary proceedings in accordance with law at the earliest and in any case within a period of one year from the receipt of writ of this Court.

[ M.M. SATHAYE, J ] [ SUNIL B. SHUKRE, J. ] by AARTI G PALKAR Date:

2023.03.28 11:32:23 +0530 AARTI PALKAR Aarti Palkar 1/1 23.WP.4937.2018.doc