Bombay High CourtWP/4992/2014others disposed off

Rajivkumar Jagannath Singh v. The State Of Maharashtra

2015-01-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice M.L. Tahaliyani2 pages

5)WP4992.14

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4992 OF 2014 Rajivkumar Jagannath Singh ..

Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ..

Respondent Mr. Amol D. Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. V.B. Konde-Deshmukh, APP for the respondent CORAM:-M.L. TAHALIYANI, J.

DATED : -20/01/2015 P.C.

Admit. Respondent waives service. By consent of the parties, taken up for final hearing.

Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the respondent-State.

The grievance of he petitioner is that the offence registered against him was allegedly committed within the jurisdiction of Wadala Police Station and it has been investigated by Antop Hill Police Station. The learned APP maintains that the place of offence within the jurisdiction of Antop Hill Police Station. Even 1/2

5)WP4992.14 if, the contention of learned advocate for the petitioner is accepted, there is nothing invalid which may be sufficient to declare that the whole investigation was vitiated. It may at the most be irregularity. There is no substance in the petition. The petition stands dismissed summarily.

(JUDGE) md.saleem 2/2