Tufansing Karamsingh Dudhani @ Shikalkar v. The State Of Maharashtra

9.BA.3346.19.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.3346 OF 2019 Tufan Singh Karansingh Dudani ... Applicant V/s.

The State Of Maharashtra ... Respondent ------------------- Mr. A.M. Saraogi for the Applicant.

Mr. S.R. Agarkar, APP for the State.

--------------------- Digitally signed by Pallavi M.

Wargaonkar Date:

2020.06.30 16:46:32 +0530 Pallavi M.

Wargaonkar CORAM :SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J DATED :30th JUNE, 2020.

P.C. :

1.

This is an application seeking bail under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The applicant is arrested in Crime No.I-39 of 2018 registered at Khadakpada Police Station for the offences punishable under sections 302, 201, 120-B, 143, 147, 148, 149 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4, and 27 of the Arms Act. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that no overt act is attributed to the applicant and that he is a senior citizen. An earlier application was filed on medical grounds. However, the said application is rejected. The learned APP has fairly submitted that the assault was mounted on the victim by the son of the present applicant. That his wife has been enlarged on bail. However, since the applicant is also being prosecuted with the aid of sections 143, 147, 148 and 149 and that pre-meditation of the assault is clearly spelt out, the applicant does not deserve bail. PMW

9.BA.3346.19.doc However, soon after the Courts assume normalcy the learned Sessions Court shall make every endeavour to expedite the trial and complete the same as far as possible within 9 months from the date of framing charge. Application is disposed of.

(SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J) PMW