Ishwarchandra Narendra Chillal Through Its Constituted Attorney v. The Pune Municipal Corporation Through Its Commissioner And ORS

1 908 RPWst 33122-17 in WP 560-15 wt CAOst.doc Sequeira

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (Stamp) NO. 33122 OF 2017 In WRIT PETITION NO. 560 OF 2015 With CIVIL APPLICATION (Stamp) NO.33123 of 2017 (For Condonation of Delay) in REVIEW PETITION (Stamp) NO. 33122 OF 2017 Ishwarchandra Narendra Chillal.

.. Petitioner/Applicant Vs The Pune Municipal Corporation and others. .. Respondents Mr.S.S.Kulkarni, for the Petitioner.

Ms.M.P.Thakur - AGP, for Respondent-State.

Mr.Rajdeep Khandeparkar, for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM : DR.MANJULA CHELLUR, C.J.

AND M.S.SONAK, J.

DATE : NOVEMBER 29, 2017.

P.C.:

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner.

2.

Since we only directed the Respondent-authorities to consider the application to be filed before the Corporation, we have not passed any orders whether the Petitioner is entitled for any

2 908 RPWst 33122-17 in WP 560-15 wt CAOst.doc compensation right from the year 1984 onwards. It is open to the Petitioner to seek such benefit and it is left open to the Respondentauthorities to consider the same strictly in accordance with the procedure contemplated. Petition is allowed to this extent. All contentions are kept open.

3.

In view of the above, Civil Application stands disposed of.

M.S.SONAK, J.

CHIEF JUSTICE