Smt.Sairka Sureka v. Shri. Mahendra Sureka

1 / 1 15-CA-283-17.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.283 OF 2017 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.186 OF 2017 Sarika Sureka .... Applicant versus Mahendra Sureka ... Respondent .......

• Ms.Jai Kanade, a/w Mr.Sumit S. Kothari, Advocate for the Applicant.

• Mr.R.T. Lalwani a/w Mr.Prakash Mahadik, Advocate for the Respondent.

CORAM

: SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATE : 12th DECEMBER, 2017.

P.C. :

It would not be necessary to consider granting the prayers made in the Civil Application, as the learned counsel for the respondent makes a statement on instructions from the respondent, who is present in the Court today, that the respondent would not remarry during the pendency of the appeal.

Hence, by accepting the statement made on behalf of the respondent, that would be binding on the respondent, we dispose of the civil application.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, J.) Nesarikar