Bunty Sukhraj Machal @ Bintu v. State Of Maharashtra

* 1/4 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1041 OF 2016 IN BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2281 OF 2016 IN C.R. NO. I-501/2016 Bunty Sukhraj Machal @ Bintu .....Applicant V/s.

The State of Maharashtra Tulinj Police Station .....Respondent * * * * * * Mr. N.K. Singh i/by. Singh & Associates, Advocate for the applicant. CORAM :- N. W. SAMBRE, J.

DATED :- 21ST DECEMBER, 2016.

P.C. :- 1). Mentioned. Not on board.

2).

The learned Counsel for the applicant points out, certain typographical errors in Bail Application No. 2281 of 2016. In para-5 of the order dated 21st November, 2016, the words "with one surety" be replaced with the words "with one or two sureties" and the words "In the event of arrest of the applicant" be deleted.

* 2/4 * 3).

The said corrections are carried out to read the para as :- "Hence, the application is allowed. The applicant be released on bail on furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand only) with one or two sureties in the like amount. (N.W. SAMBRE, J)

* 3/4 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2281 OF 2016 Bunty Sukhraj Machal @ Bintu .....Applicant V/s.

The State of Maharashtra Tulinj Police Station .....Respondent * * * * * * Mr. Narendra Singh, Advocate for the applicant. Smt. N.S. Jain, APP for the respondent, State. CORAM :- N.W. SAMBRE, J.

DATED :- 21st NOVEMBER, 2016.

P.C. :- 1). The applicant is seeking regular bail in Crime No. I-501 of 2016 for offences punishable under Sections 376, 328, 324, 504, and 506 Indian Penal Code.

2).

The incident in question took place between March, 2016 to September, 2016. In the intervening period, the applicant and complainant appears to have physical relationship out of the love affair as could be inferred from the material available on record.

* 4/4 * 3).

After arrest of the applicant, the Investigation Officer has seized the mobile which is alleged to have contained the video clips of the victim. Upon verification, the learned APP states that, no such clips were found in the mobile and the mobile is sent to forensic science laboratory for appropriate report.

4).

Having regard to the fact that, there are no criminal antecedents and the investigation in the matter is complete, further custody of the applicant is not called for. 5).

Hence, the application is allowed. The applicant be released on bail on furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand only) with one or two sureties in the like amount.

6).

Any three consecutive absence before the learned trial Court will entail it to take out proceedings for cancellation of bail.

7).

The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence and/or influence the witnesses in any manner whatsoever. (N.W. SAMBRE, J) Note : The order is corrected pursuant to speaking to minutes order dated 21.12.2016.