Smt. Vinita Haresh Gaglani And ANR v. Mr. Nalin Rajni Patel

901 caa 9-14=.doc FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY.

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION.

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9 OF 2014 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST) NO. 34835 OF 2013 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. Anil Agarwal for the applicant.

None for the respondent.

CORAM : K. K. TATED, J.

DATED : 10/02/2015.

P.C.:

.

Heard learned Counsel for the applicant.

Though, the respondent is duly served, no one appeared on behalf of him when the matter called out.

The learned counsel for the applicant filed affidavit-of-service. Same is on record.

This civil application is preferred by original defendant for condonation of 43 days delay in filing the Appeal From Order.

Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant and averments made in Sneha Chavan 1/2

901 caa 9-14=.doc civil application, I am satisfied that applicant has made out the case for allowing the civil application. Hence, the following order:

i) civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a), which reads thus:

"a) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to condone the delay of 43 days caused in filing the Appeal from Order."

ii) Civil Application is disposed of accordingly.

(K.K.TATED, J.) Sneha Chavan 2/2