State Bank Of India v. Tahsildar And Taluka Executive Magistrate Panvel And ORS

IRESH SIDDHARAM MASHAL SIDDHARAM MASHAL Date: 2022.12.23 13:20:31 +0530 20.15704.22 wp.doc Iresh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 15704 OF 2022 State Bank of India ....Petitioner V/s.

Tahsildar and Taluka Executive Magistrate .....Respondents Panvel and others Mr. Subir Kumar a/w Disha Shah i/b SDS Advocates Advocate for the Petitioner.

Mr. N. K. Rajpurohit AGP for State.

CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & GAURI GODSE, JJ.

DATE :

22 DECEMBER 2022.

P.C.

This is yet one more matter where the grievance is made by a financial institution that steps under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2022 are not being taken to the logical end. It is unnecessary and unwarranted for the financial institutions to come to the High Court only for such ministerial directions. The District Magistrate/Collector, Raigad

20.15704.22 wp.doc shall give audience to the Petitioner in the week commencing from 26 December 2022 and take necessary steps after understanding the grievance of the Petitioner. We place the responsibility on the Collector to give personal audience to the Petitioner so that situation such as present one do not recur.

2.

Writ Petition is disposed of.

[GAURI GODSE, J.] [NITIN JAMDAR, J.]