← Library
Bombay High CourtABA/2145/2016others disposed off

Nadeem Mumtaz Ahmed Shaikh v. The State Of Maharashtra

2017-04-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari2 pages

Dond aba.2145-2016.sxw FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2145 OF 2016 Nadeem Mumtaz Ahmed Shaikh Vs State of Maharashtra WITH APPP NO. 138 OF 2017 Mrs. Kausar Mohammed Kaleem Shaikh .........Intervener ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's orders.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Mobid Solkar for Applicant.

Mr. Satish S. Modi i/b Kumar & Associates for Intervener. Mrs. P.P. Shinde, APP for State.

Mr. Satyawan Kadam, PSI, Mira Road Police Station present. CORAM : A.S. GADKARI, J.

DATE : 21st April 2017.

P.C.:

1] The applicant is granted interim relief by an Order dated 5th January 2017. 2] Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned Counsel for the Intervener-Original Complainant at length. 3] After perusal of the first information report, it is revealed that the alleged incident as contemplated under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code had taken place six-to-seven months prior to lodgment of the first information report. It further appears that the physical relationship between the applicant and the first

Dond aba.2145-2016.sxw informant was continued in the intervening period. The allegations against the applicant as contemplated under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code was consensual act between two adult persons and prima facie it appears that after the said relationship between the applicant and first informant came to the light, the first informant lodged the report. It is to be noted here that, the alleged incident occurred on 20.3.2016 and the crime is registered on 22.10.2016 i.e. approximately seven months from the date of incident. 4] In view of the aforesaid facts, the applicant has made out a case for grant of pre-arrest bail. In view thereof, the interim relief granted by an Order dated 5th January 2017 is hereby confirmed.

5] The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. 6] In view of disposal of the A.B.A. No.2145 of 2016, Criminal Application No.138 of 2017 does not survive and the same is accordingly disposed off. (A.S. GADKARI, J.)