Mozes Villiam Madankar v. The State Of Maharashtra

12.ba2786.17

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2786 OF 2017 Mozes Villiam Madankar.

... Applicant.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra.

... Respondent.

--- Mr. Satyam H. Nimbalkar, advocate for Applicant. Mr. Y.M. Nakhwa, APP for State.

--- CORAM : SMT.SADHANA S. JADHAV,J DATE : JANUARY 19, 2018 P.C.:

Learned Counsel for the applicant fairly submits that trial has commenced and the prosecution has recorded substantive evidence of 3 witnesses. However, since last witness was examined the trial has almost at stand-still since the witnesses are not responding to the summons issued to the court. It is in these circumstances that the trial needs to be expedited.

It is in these circumstances that the learned Magistrate, Baramati seized with R.C.C. No. 346 of 2016 shall make every Talwalkar 1/2

12.ba2786.17 endeavour to summon the witnesses and not grant unwarranted adjournment to the prosecution and conclude recording of evidence as far as possible within 4 months from the date of receipt of this order.

The application is disposed of accordingly.

(SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV,J) Talwalkar 2/2