Smt. Pallavi Dinesh Savenkar v. Shri. Dinesh Raghunath Savenkar

Dixit

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.18 OF 2015 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST.) NO.34250 OF 2014 Pallavi Dinesh Savenkar ....

Applicant V/s.

Dinesh Raghunath Savenkar ....

Respondent Mr. Manoj Bhatt for the Appellant.

Ms. Seema Sarnaik for the Respondent.

CORAM : V.M. KANADE & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.J.

DATE : 23 RD SEPTEMBER, 2015.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

This Civil Application is filed for condonation of delay in preferring the Appeal. This Civil Application is opposed by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent/husband, submitting that the Respondent/husband has got re-married after the period of limitation was over.

1/3

3.

Be that as it may, the re-marriage of the Respondent/husband will not dis-entitle the Appellant/wife to challenge the impugned order. Hence, for the reasons stated in the Civil Application, the delay of 67 days caused in filing the Appeal is condoned.

4.

The Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). [DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.] [V.M. KANADE, J.] 2/3

C E R T I F I C A T E Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed Order.

3/3