← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/1069/2017disposed off

Ipm India Wholesale Trading Pvt. Ltd. v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS.

2017-02-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice B.P. Colabawalla,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.C. Dharmadhikari2 pages

vikrant 1/2 906-WP-1069-2017.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1069 OF 2017 IPM India Wholesale Trading Pvt. Ltd.

... Petitioner Vs.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 14305 OF 2016 IMP India Wholesale Trading Pvt. Ltd.

... Petitioner Vs.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents ......

Mr. V. Sridharan, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Rahul Thakar and Mr. Jas Sanghavi i/b. PDS Legal for the Petitioner in both the Petitions.

Mr. P. G. Sawant, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 in both the Petitions.

......

CORAM :

S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & B. P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.

DATE :

FEBRUARY 28, 2017.

P.C. :

1.

Heard both sides. These Writ Petitions challenge the orders of assessment, both dated 29th March, 2016, passed by respondent no.3.

2.

After the Writ Petitions were heard for some time and a suggestion was given by the Court to the respondents as to why an order of assessment cannot be made afresh, Mr. Sawant appearing on behalf the respondents sought time to take instructions in the morning session.

vikrant 2/2 906-WP-1069-2017.odt 3.

After taking instructions, Mr. Sawant states that the 3rd respondent's orders dated 29th March, 2016 be quashed and set aside. The 3rd respondent will now pass fresh orders and as expeditiously as possible.

4.

In view of the agreement between the parties on the above, we dispose of these Writ Petitions by consent, with the following directions:

a.

The impugned orders, both dated 29.03.2016, passed by respondent no.3 are quashed and set aside. The matters are restored to the file of respondent no.3 for fresh assessment in accordance with law. All contentions of parties are kept open.

b.

The petitioner shall not raise the objection that the assessment orders, which are now been set aside, are barred by limitation.

c.

The petitioner to appear before respondent no.3 on 17th March, 2017.

d.

The re-assessment to be completed within a period of 4 months from today.

(B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)