Sachin Damodar Bagal v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

wp.5005.17.5.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5005 OF 2017 Sachin Damodar Bagal

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...Respondents

None for the Petitioner Dr. F. R. Shaikh, A.P.P for the Respondent No. 1-State None for Respondent No. 2 CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.

TUESDAY, 8 th JANUARY 2019 P.C. :

Nobody for parties even on second call.

As nobody appeared, matter is called out again at 4:45 p.m., since as per order dated 12th July 2018, it was to be taken up at 4:30 p.m.

Counsel for the petitioner Mr. Saurabh Dilip Butala is present with petitioner and informs that on 11th April 2018, wife has already filed an affidavit giving no objection. SQ Pathan 1/2

wp.5005.17.5.doc There is no appearance for respondent No. 2. This Court has, on 12th July 2018, already observed that mater would proceed further even in absence of respondent No. 2. Matter thereafter has been adjourned twice by this Court.

We have perused that affidavit. Marriage between petitioner and respondent No. 2 is already dissolved by decree of divorce.

In this situation, we make rule absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.

SQ Pathan 2/2