Shri. Sadanand Annapa Shetty v. Mehboob Ahmed Essop And ORS.

903-CAW2836-17.DOC Shephali

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2836 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2894 OF 2017 Sadanand Annapa Shetty ...Applicant

Versus

Mehboob Ahmed Essop & Ors

...Respondents

Mr Girish S Godbole, i/b Mohan D Naik, for the Applicant/ Petitioner.

Mr Kunal Bhanage, a/w Mr Aditya Deolekar, Vaidehi B & Saurabhi Vaknis, i/b Diamondwala & Co,for the Respondents Nos. 1 to 9. CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED:

6th December 2017 PC:- 1.

Heard.

2.

The Civil Application seeks an extension of time by eight week to make the deposit ordered by MS Sonak J on 12th October 2017 order. That was an order by consent and in that order Applicant/Petitioner agreed to make a deposit at the rate of Rs. 2 lakhs per month within eight weeks.

6th December 2017

903-CAW2836-17.DOC 3.

In the present application there is a representation made on various grounds for an extension of time. Some of these reasons are acceptable, while others are not. I do not propose to enter into the genuineness of these reasons, but I will as a matter of a final indulgence and nothing further more than one last and final extension till 31st January 2018. The default clause in the order dated 12th October 2017 will operate at the end of the day on 31st January 2018 if deposit is not made.

4.

The civil application is disposed of in these terms. There will be no order as to costs.

(G. S. PATEL, J) 6th December 2017