Dilip Jawaharsingh Sahejsinghani And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra

1 /2 10-ABA-1905-2015.doc Ladda FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1905 of 2015 Dilip Jawaharsingh Sahejsinghani & Anr Vs. The State of Maharashtra. Office Notes, Office Memorandam of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr R.G. Gaikwad for the applicants.

Smt. S.S.Kaushik, APP for the State.

P.P.Chaudhari, API, Vitthalwadi P.S. present. CORAM : A.S.GADKARI, J.

DATE : 20th January, 2016 P.C.

1) The applicants are protected by an interim order dated 18.12.2015. The learned APP, on instructions, submitted that the applicants have attended the Investigating Officer on the stipulated dates and have joined the process of investigation. She further, on instructions, submitted that the custodial interrogation of the applicants is not necessary as the applicants are the in-laws of the complainant. She submitted that the son of the applicant namely Vicky Dilip Sahijsinghani is not traceable and as per her instructions the applicants may be knowing the whereabouts of their son and therefore the applicants may be directed to attend the Investigating Officer as and when called for.

2) In view of the above, the interim relief granted by an order

2 /2 10-ABA-1905-2015.doc dated 18.12.2015 is hereby confirmed.

3) The applicants shall attend the Investigating Officer as and when called for between 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon for the purpose of investigation. It is needless to mention that before calling the applicants to the police station, the concerned police officer shall issue a notice under section 160 of Cr.P.C.

4) The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. (A.S. GADKARI, J.)