Mrs. Pushpa Ganpat Tike v. Neeta Builders Thr. Its Partners,

4 ao 690-16.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 690 OF 2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 870 OF 2016 Mr. Pushpa Ganpat Tike ..Appellant v/s.

Neeta Builders ..Respondents None for the Appellant/Applicant.

None for the Respondent.

CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.

DATED : 05th MARCH, 2019.

P.C.

1.

None present for the appellant. It is seen that on the last date also none remained present on behalf of the appellant. Hence, by way of indulgence and as final opportunity, the matter was listed today for dismissal.

2.

It is seen that today also neither the appellant nor his counsel is present. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. 3.

In view of dismissal of the appeal, Civil Application does not survive and the same also stands dismissed.

(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) salgaonkar